SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Clayton Williams Energy (CWEI) OIL
CWEI 131.900.0%Apr 25 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ridemhigher who wrote (182)12/16/1996 9:09:00 PM
From: Buzz Mills   of 1017
 
John,

Thanks for bringing that up: Good Point on how does an analyst add the already earned 0.96 to his estimate of 0.56 and come up with 1.70; I asked the same question when I first received the Paine Webber estimate; check out the note I put at the bottom of the post:
techstocks.com
Even Rodman, Renshaws numbers don't add correctly, but they are at least closer: 0.96 + 0.58 = $1.56; initially I was just given the R&R estimate for the year and so I "assumed" R&R's fourth quarter estimate was 0.60---wrong again--I guess if you are an analyst you are allowed that latitude. It is a coincidence though I was just thinking about PW's discrepancy on the way home just now. Thought I would attempt to find out who the analyst at PW is and drop him/her an Email asking for an explanation. But I won't be surprised if CWEI actually earns $1.70 for the year--it is a stretch but if their production is ahead of last quarter they can do it. I'll let you know if I track down the PW analyst. In the meantime I have asked Lajuanda Holder (Email), CWEI IR, again about new estimates from Hanifen, Imhoff and Morgan Keegan--those analysts were out of the office last week. Morgan Keegan is the one who has yet to submit their new estimate to Zacks. Morgan Keegan (presently rating CWEI a Hold) is talking about doing a new write-up + change their rating on CWEI as soon as CWEI firms up their exploration plans on the Pinnacle Reef wells. Paine Webber is Neutral and I think these ratings came about when CWEI stumbled when they first went public and in the '93/'94/'95 time frame, creating not too good of a situation for PW and others who took them public. I would think that now that CWEI is on track that both of these ratings will change in just a matter of time--that will make a major difference. Zacks, Rodman, Renshaw, and Hanifen, Imhoff have CWEI rated a Strong Buy.

Kendell, I was thinking the same way you were--might not be a bad time to hedge some futures--guarantee good oil prices in the first quarter of '97. CWEI will easily better '96 first quarter numbers, with, or without, hedging.

Buzz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext