SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 492.01+1.3%12:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Reginald Middleton who wrote (10306)8/26/1998 2:53:00 PM
From: paul  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
no its not.

Oracle 8 on Windows NT is priced at $295 a seat list - a similar price to SQL*Server.

Oracle 8 also runs on over 80 platforms such as linux which is free to a Sun E250 which starts at under $10,000. With Sun you can start with a e250 and scale up to a e10,000 - a 64 cpu machine that can be clustered with up to 4 machines (total of 256 processors). with NT - hmmm...where can you go today? Managing a distributed NT network is a nightmare with none of the RAS, uptime or manageability of Unix.

listen - as far as i know running sql*server is fine on a single machine - a small business or file and print application or replacing Novell - remember - Oracle on Netware was a hot thing at one point. It had nothing to do with replacing unix or mainframes.

I have offered many proposals to customers consolidating multiple NT application servers onto a single unix server saving not only in upfront hardware costs but sys administration and system uptime as well.

All of Compaq's industry leading TPC benchmark's are on SCO Unix although they are hidden in the fine text - they are not run on Windows NT.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext