SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Tusk Energy (TKE)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: grayhairs who wrote (799)8/27/1998 12:08:00 AM
From: RIK  Read Replies (1) of 1207
 
1) IMO in Alberta , a gas discovery of 100BCF or an oil discovery of 10 MM bbls would qualify as a MAJOR discovery. Each of these discoveries would have a present worth of approximately $75MM.

2) Not only do I believe that that we are not dealing with a MAJOR discovery but I also believe there is a strong possibility that only marginal reserves were encountered in the DEEP zone . [ for greater clarity read marginal as ' no reserves' ]

I know you have reported field observations in the order of 3.5mmcf/d on production test ......sorry but I have read all of your posts on the Bearcat thread ...... if those are any indication of your field skills then you should not be surprised that I have discounted them totally in my DD .

One of my grayhairs 'favs'.....Bearcat post #496. [notice all the capital letters ]

"WELL, DON'T BUY THAT CRAP!! THIS WELL'S A REAL WINNER!! I DON'T
CARE WHAT IT IS - MAYBE JUST A CONDENSATE RICH NATURAL GAS
WELL CAPABLE OF LONG TERM SUSTAINED PRODUCTION AT, I'M
GUESSING, 7 to 10 MMCF/D (WITH +/- 700 TO 1,000 BBLS/D
CONDENSATE), OR, - MAYBE JUST A PROLIFIC OIL WELL WITH A LOT
OF SOLUTION GAS THAT WILL BE CONSERVED AND SOLD.

EITHER ONE RINGS THE CASH REGISTER QUITE NICELY, GENTLEMEN!!"



3) Proven Producing Reserves : 0*
Proven Undeveloped Reserves : 0*
Probable Reserves : 0*

* no reliable information is available

4) ?????????? pass

5) 0

6) There is no reason to change my opinion in that respect .

Quote from TUSK 1997 Annual report.......... " intermediate casing has been set at 3420 meters and that a number of potential hydrocarbon producing zones were behind pipe ."

Until these POTENTIAL zones are tested to determine fluid content , productivity and reservoir size , reserves and NAV can not be calculated .

grayhairs ....you know better !!!!!!..........check out your post # 407 on the Bearcat thread.

"They can't hold off testing because they need productivity and other info themselves.Unfortunately, a pay interval that looks great on logs sometimes does not produce very well and sometimes a pay interval may even flow an unexpected fluid. As they say,"S--t happens"!! They can not take the risk of bidding big bucks for offsetting lands to later find out that this well produces only water, or that it produces a lot of water along with some oil or gas, or even that it is not capable of any production. That would cost a job or two, me thinks!!"

I think that we will call this the " grayhairs S--t happens Theorem"

Me thinks I'm gonna go fishing for a few days and forget about Stuff like this !!!!!

Have a pleasant evening........you silly engineer you!!!!!
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext