SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI Grammar and Spelling Lab

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Yamakita who wrote (1457)8/27/1998 3:29:00 AM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (2) of 4711
 
I dislike the phrase because I think it sounds awful. Almost as bad as saying someone "has attitude". I've never been able to grasp the distinction between having attitude and being an asshole, and I can't grasp the distinction between being in denial and being ignorant.

Probably because I'm crude, insensitive, and politically incorrect.

Two questions:

1. Am I the only one who hates the phrase?
2. Has anyone found an effective way to slide around it?

I should admit from the beginning that while I am descended from English professors and have been writing professionally for most of my adult life, I have only a rudimentary understanding of formal grammar. What little I know I learned by osmosis, not education. I read as much good writing as I can and I revise whatever I write (except SI posts) until I like the way it sounds. I often reject phrases simply because I dislike them, and I occasionally wonder if I am technically right.

Either way, I still believe that in writing, as elsewhere, unnecessary ugliness is not pardonable. Wrong or right, if it offends my ear, out it goes.

Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext