Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wallacestevens who wrote (822)	8/27/1998 2:42:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (3) of 67261

Excuse me but I find the religious right to be far more threatening than any one individuals conduct, even if its the President, and this argument is even more pronounced based on the fact that I cant get any real facts out of this Starr investigation so any judgement on this issue would be presumption on my part. This does not mean that I condone anything the President has alledgedly done. You know people, just as a general rule, if some poster here has an attitude problem or resorts to nasty personal attacks then the replies tend to also be emotional sound bytes. Im sure thats what happened here with my friend Wallace Stevens. Not that I am not guilty of the same behavior btw. I dont see any evidence that any one individual has some sort of higher level intellectual capacity here vs any other. I do concede that someone who is say, a lawyer might be more equipped to argue the legal points of this issue vs. some of us technical types. Which is not to say that their opinion is more valid on the morality issues. MH

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next