So that is your proof ?
or
As expected.
Here is how it works, for anyone who is interested.
You call someone, anyone, a liar.
Then you post the proof that they are a liar.
What is not clear ? anyone can figure this out.
Proof is proof
Ranting is ranting, anyone knows this.
Here is an example, KCsunshine came onto this board and regaled us all with tales of history about short squeezes. I pointed out that he was out to lunch. I did this by pointing out a ten year chart of BINC. BINC never did anything like he claimed it did. Here is the decade chart of BINC again.
bigcharts.com
It wouldn't matter at all, if bmart wasn't here already proclaiming that this is a wonderful stock and explaining that is was going to be a short squeeze. When you look at KCsunshines statements in that light, it is obvious he wants people to believe that this happened on BINC, it didn't. He is reinforcing bmarts tales with facts that are not facts. You guys can go ahead and attack me, it doesn't change anything. What happens is you all look Stupider and Stupider. After all, this is SI's Stupidest Thread, so the readers expect to be entertained.
Now, back to my question.
Who substantiates the claims made by Amazon in regards to their "new" products. bmart contradicts the company directly, so his information is really useless, isn't it ? Who attests to the historical use of plants found in the Amazon Basin and Highlands. Who provides the evidence of efficacy.
Do you suppose that they Ask the Indian |
