Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (834)	8/27/1998 5:04:00 PM
From: RJC2006	Read Replies (1) of 67261

<<<<Excuse me but I find the religious right to be far more threatening than any one individuals conduct, even if its the President, and this argument is even more pronounced based on the fact that I cant get any real facts out of this Starr investigation so any judgement on this issue would be presumption on my part. This does not mean that I condone anything the President has alledgedly done.>>> <thumbing through The Liberal's Dictionary....> RIGHT WING noun. 1. Commonly referred to as human beings that attend religious services. 2. Those having a certain set of moral values as portrayed in the Christian Bible most notably the Ten Commandments. 3. Characterized by liberal thinkers as despots in the 1990s based solely from disagreement on thoughts and ideas. 4. Typically anyone who disagreed with one of liberal thinking such as Republicans to include even those considered of moderate temper. right winger , right winged <<<You know people, just as a general rule, if some poster here has an attitude problem or resorts to nasty personal attacks then the replies tend to also be emotional sound bytes. Im sure thats what happened here with my friend Wallace Stevens. >>> No, your friend Wallace is an idiot regardless. <<<Not that I am not guilty of the same behavior btw.>>> Welcome to the neighborhood. <<<I dont see any evidence that any one individual has some sort of higher level intellectual capacity here vs any other.>>> Ahh come on, don't go here. <<<I do concede that someone who is say, a lawyer might be more equipped to argue the legal points of this issue vs. some of us technical types. Yeah, just ask the Clintons. <smirk> <<<Which is not to say that their opinion is more valid on the morality issues.>>> <LAUGH> Yeah, a lawyer with higher moral values then us technical types.<GUFFAW> You're all right Michelle. I don't care what wallace says.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next