SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 166.81-4.1%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Clarksterh who wrote (14209)8/27/1998 5:37:00 PM
From: Dave  Read Replies (2) of 152472
 
Clark:

RE: best 'implementations' patented

Well, let's say the Q has the best (meaning most efficient) implementations patented. Their competition can get patents on other less efficient implementations and, therefore, not license from the Q.

In a way, a patent is a double edged sword. Once you have got it, you have protection. However, it is now in the public domain and people/entities are allowed to modify and "get around" your patent. Make sense?

RE: "If, in a patented filter, you change one capacitor is that a new implemetation or not?"

There is case law on that. What if, by changing the value of the capacitor, you get an unexpected result? There are a couple of ways to get a patent. One being a novel idea. Another being an unexpected result. If I remember correctly, the case was Graham V. John Deere. I will summarize what happened if you wish...

dave
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext