SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Trump's 12 Diamond Picks, Discussions Limited
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Walt who wrote (1212)8/28/1998 12:32:00 AM
From: Tomato  Read Replies (1) of 2251
 
Walt,

There's a new analyst's report on the WSP website. I wonder if you could explain this sentence to me:

"It should be kept in mind that if a
room and pillar mining approach was taken, the mining reserve would be considerably less than the geological
reserve, and that mining under probably a 2 m thickness would dilute grade"

Then, a bit later into the report, it says that Dr. P thinks that the source or pipe could be several hundred meters below the lake. If this is true and they are able to find it, could be it economic? Then the report compares the possible difference between Snap and Lac de Gras. Maybe you could put that all in laymen's language for us dweebs?

Thanks.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News