Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (1009)	8/28/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) of 67261

<<As it stands, if it werent for all these "leaks" generated by Starr, we would know very little about what was going on>> Another place where we differ. In Starr's past investigation, there were no leaks suspected from his office. He has no history of leaks, and I don't see how leaks would help his position. However, Clinton supporters do have a history of leaking information both as trial baloons and to start rumours or damage control - release the information a little at a time to inure the public to it, and get them to call for a halt to the investigation. Since the response to the leaks had been utterly anti-Starr (until the dress mess), why would Starr continue to leak information, especially when he was under investigation? Of course, Clinton continued to engage in "questionable" sexual activity even though he knew he was under investigation. Given the circumstances, I think it is more likely the leaks did not come from Starr's office.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next