Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jim McMannis who wrote (36307)	8/28/1998 8:48:00 PM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (2) of 1571734

Jim, Re: "Yousef, What was that you said about AMD never getting to 350Mhz?" RELAX Jim ... Trying to re-write history again ?? Here is hat I said regarding AMD and K6-2 at 350Mhz --> Message 5152113 "Bob, Re: "AMD claims they will have 350MHz in Q3 and 400MHz in Q4. Do you think they will do this on the current process?" It could be possible to get 350mhz parts out of the existing process ... but the control could be an issue. I would recommend that AMD develop a Rev2 device/FET that would use the existing interconnect from the .25um process. This would be the sure way to get to 350mhz, 400mhz or 450mhz. This could be developed in Santa Clara, but I would prefer to see this developed at the manufacturing site (Austin). This is the only way for AMD to get "back in the game". I have been very consistent, Jim ... AMD is still 100mhz behind Intel AND behind about $125 ASP. <ggg> Make It So, Yousef

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next