Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (36445)	8/28/1998 11:46:00 PM
From: Maxwell	Read Replies (1) of 1583677

Tenchusatsu: <<As for MMX being a dead bead, it's funny how AMD and Cyrix both chose to support MMX in their latest processors, eh? Whether or not you think MMX does any good is irrelevant. In fact, it shows just how well Intel can market such a technology which isn't as useful as it originally seemed.>> Yes Intel is getting all the credit for developing the MMX. As a matter of fact MMX is a trademark of Intel. MMX is a "stupid invention" from Intel. As long as MMX is around people will remember of Intel stupid invention. I bet you Intel must be very proud of this stupid achievement. It sure built a good relationship with the ISV. << Imagine how well Intel can market MMX2 whose usefulness far outshines MMX.>> Have you ever been cheated TWICE by the same person? Well if you do then you are not very smart. That is why there is a word said "Once bitten twice shy". Yes Intel will trumpet their MMX2 by next year and consumers will remember the MMX fiasco. Also for your information the KNI API will be support by MS DirectX 7.0 to be released JULY 1999! Katmai will be useless till summer of 1999. <<Like I said before, AMD doesn't enjoy the economies of scale that Intel.>> You need to get a job in the semiconductor industry. The economy of scale of a fab is 1 FAB! It costs twice as much to run 2 FABs, and thrice for 3 FABs. The only thing you really save is the R&D. Yield and die size is everything in each fab. <<Why is 3D-Now such a big deal, while MMX2 is going to be "no big deal"? Is it because 3D-Now was first to market? Are you arguing that developers aren't going to support KNI merely because 3D-Now just happened to come first? (Maybe that's what Maxwell was arguing.)>>> Yes you are absolutely right. Time to the market is everything. AMD was able to get support from all vendors such as MS, SGI, TDFX, Matrox, SIS, IBM, game makers, etc. a year before the chip was rolled out. That is no trivial task but it was easy for AMD at that time since there was no other technology viable. MMX2 is very late to the market and it won't come cheap when it is released. By then already 12M+ users demanding 3DNow! KNI will just be another failed attempt by Intel just like Intel tried to penetrate the market with the first Celeron. KNI is not compatible with 3DNow since it uses a different opcodes. Had Intel been smart they would have made KNI backward compatible with 3DNow! Intel is just too proud and to save face they got to have it their way. The KNI will lose. If you want to know the development of 3DNow check out this webpage. ren.tierranet.com Unlike the MMX the 3DNow initiative is quite active. Current ISVs are still not quite up to speed writing 3DNow codes. That is why Unreal and Incoming perform so poorly. QuakeII/QuakeIII and Trespasser will be the first games that optimally coded for 3DNow! By Christmas there will be plenty of games for 3DNow. Maxwell

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next