Hi, Robert,
While I do not disagree with your proposition that it's nobody's business if a group of VLNC bulls wants to party, I do disagree with the implication that they are therefore entitled to monopolize the Valence thread. Reducing the SI Valence thread to such a single purpose would be of little more benefit to other readers than the current Yahoo thread where the juvenile-minded reign today. If there is need for such a "party" thread, perhaps someone should establish a "Valence Bull Party" thread. The present thread, "Valence Technology (VLNC)," does not have such a narrow charter. To be of any value to the general readership, it must remain open to all points of view.
From this standpoint, Visnic has provided many valuable, if trenchant, critiques of Valence's precarious fundamentals. Despite his regrettable (if understandable) lapses into attacking the motives and intelligence of some of the Valence bulls, he has provided useful counterpoints to many of the optimistic arguments of us Valence bulls. I find this valuable to keeping the rose tint of my own glasses under control. That he often comes across as a somewhat arrogant self-appointed savior of us bullish fools remains an acceptable price to pay for keeping my own vision clear.
Regards, lws |
