I agree with the spirit of your first four paragraphs, though some of your fine points are a little fuzzy. The fact is though, you know nothing of the actual issues that I will be raising about David. And of course, David's trying to mislead this forum about what the issues are. I won't discuss the issues here, so he will continue to mislead you here -- at least for as long as he can. There's nothing that will stay my course in this matter and the more he blusters, swaggers and misrepresents here, the less good it will do his cause in the end. Your comments simply don't apply to the actual issues, though it's nice of you to have an opinion anyway. :-) This is getting repetitious. I won't respond to the next several people who think they know what they're talking about in this matter, and don't. Especially since I won't address the issues here, I should let David continue to lead you astray and just make a record of it all, I suppose.
If anyone has any issues about David they'd like to share with me privately, they can feel free to communicate privately, though.
By the way, in case anyone wants to check David's latest lie: ask SI if Jill has a record of the Private Mail posted here. What they can have is mail sent to them purporting to be private mail posted here.
Linda |
