TA-Quotes Plus Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sean W. Smith who wrote (6180)	8/30/1998 12:10:00 AM
From: MrBuzz	Read Replies (1) of 11149

Then we have a problem in the scans we have... Compare the examples of the Moving Average Crossover source code as well as the MovAvg() function documentation. Then compare the Brookins source code along with the EMovAvg() function documentation. Notice the documentation discusses LENGTH as the second parameter. And the use of EMovAvg() in the Brookins scan appears to be incorrect while the Moving Average Crossover example seems to be correct. Again, I ask, which is the right representation. Can someone here representing Quotes Plus find out EXACTLY and post a response to this question as well as an example, explanation and thoroughly tested result based on this research? The only way to determine this is to do a source code level interpretation (i.e. C/C++) of the product... i would not rely on the documentation at this point. I hope this doesn't go overlooked. It is critical to have correct scan source as well as documentation. The interpretation of the second parameter is important. If one relies on these averages as buy/sell limit orders, a messed up calculation such as this results in missed oppportunities and possibly losses. Thank you for your concern, MrBuzz

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next