DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!!

DGIV 0.00

Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: RocketMan who wrote (23915)	8/31/1998 9:49:00 PM
From: ANALYST10	Read Replies (1) of 50264

First of all AOL did go where I said it would and if you think I didn't take a profit and ride it down 50% then I should just retire. AS far as the notes, don't have inside info, simply ask the company and they will acknowledge. The 25 mil, well where is it, it ain't in there bank and nothing has been signed, and I won't even spend an hour getting into how i know, except to say DD As far as your 168k shares (which means nothing) it was a bad tick on the system Acknowledging positives would be nice if there were any and they have some meaning and could be established. Buying a piece of equipment that you or I could buy isn't earth shattering news. News is 1. revenues, (which there are none to speak of) 2. earnings ( of which there is a lack of) 3. receipt of money ( of which there is none) 4. a strengthened balance sheet (which there isn't) 5. gaining "demonstrated" market share in an industry (with results) These are basic fundamentals. Talk about AOL, YHOO, SEEK or any internet or hyped company there is still some underpinnings to them, of which there are none here. If you want I can debate the facts with you all day long, but DGIV is what it is. As far as getting someone's name right well excuse me for my mistyping I guess that's a real valid point as to my credibility. The handwriting here is on the wall. You take investment basics and apply them to all companies and see where they stand. Its no different in its application regardless of the company. Press releases don't make a company. As far as the potential of their product I don't want to start a war but forget about call back software, because ain't nothing proprietary and as far as the other DGIV technology, what do you think is proprietary that they have a patent for that cannot be replicated in one format or another.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next