Bema(Bgo) and Arizona Star Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Bema(Bgo) and Arizona Star

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elizabeth Andrews who wrote (9677)	9/2/1998 8:56:00 AM
From: John Soileau	Read Replies (1) of 10482

Pretty sweeping statements, Elizabeth--I'd like to know what facts you have based them on. A few questions: 1. "Not viable now or ever"--you mean this in an absolute sense? Not viable at $278 gold, not viable at $400 gold, just not viable "ever"? 2. How are economics "suspect"? Your earlier statement would seem to exclude any suspicions at all--remember, not viable "now or ever"? 3. How did you determine the deposits (plural) are pittable for only a few meters? Was this based on public information? Have you visited the area? 4. Who are the "insiders" you refer to? Bema is about as big an insider there is with regard to ECM; did you mean, or include, Bema when you said this? I'd appreciate your further input since it obviously matters to all ECM owners whether you are right or not. Thanks in advance John

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next