>>>AJammer, though I think he means well, is one of them. He is there only to spin and changes with the wind. Example: He now supports Hayton when just recently he thought Hayton was a bad guy. <<<
Aleta, we all go through changes. I've been through changes, Ajammer's been through changes and you've been through changes. Have you forgotten that you once thought Hayton was a bad guy and then, after you spoke with him, thought he was a good guy?
Ajammer, I believe, had the good sense to read between the lines in that Wired article. When I stated it was balanced, it was. It at least gave the companies hopes the conclusion, as per Lance Estes remarks. I think he finally recognized that we are being had here, but the company is not the perpetrator.
And in so far as your earlier comment regarding my objectivity, I had my own spell where I was putting forth a strong dose of negative questions. I remind you also that had the insight to recognize and accept the negative aspect of what Wired wrote. I've also written in the past that the company should come forth and describe its errors of the past, get everything out into the open and start anew. I'm not only cheerleading, but I am critic as well.
I assure you, were Jon Tara not putting forth 10-20 negative posts a day, my posting on SI would be reduced substantially. I assure you, if there were not a dozen or so anti-Zulu posters on ESVS/Yahoo, my posting there would be substantially reduced as well.
In fact, were there only objective criticism of this company, I would be a regular participant. But there's not. There never has been. In fact, there has only been a concerted campaign to spew venom on every positive feature of the company. When good news comes out, it gets twisted; when bad news comes out it gets amplified. You can't fault my level of objectivity when the battle is constantly against forces such as these. |
