SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR)
QLGC 16.070.0%Aug 24 5:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jad who wrote (17916)9/2/1998 3:23:00 PM
From: Greg Hull  Read Replies (1) of 29386
 
To all:

The link supplied by JAD included the following:

rtcgroup.com

The higher-power lasers are most often accompanied with handshaking control circuitry (required for safety purposes), which low-power lasers do not generally have; thus, there is incompatibility. Also, lasers operating at different wavelengths cannot generally be used in a given application. The designer must also choose fiber optimized to the operating laser's wavelength. Future use of opticalwavelength-division multiplexers (DWMs), relatively new devices that are fast being applied throughout the long-haul elecommunications network, may ultimately address the aforementioned power and wavelength constraints.

Does anyone here have a feel for the applicability of DWDM and erbium doped fiber amplifiers to FC fabrics and switches? I'm guessing that throughput on the fiber would increase as well as the distance between devices and the switch. Could FC switches handle the 16, 40, 80 or 96 channels talked about for telecommunications? Would additional wavelengths on the fiber require a faster backplane or faster ASICs?

As usual, I'm all questions and no answers. Anybody out there have a feel for this?

Greg
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext