SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lonnie who wrote (2297)9/2/1998 5:23:00 PM
From: Peter V  Read Replies (1) of 4634
 
<<and how will you be able to prove he read it?>>

or for that matter, whether he understood it. After all, the TAVA thread voted him to be an idiot, didn't they? (dumb like a fox, I'd say <G>)

But maybe Bill has a spelling problem, and meant to say "TAVA is a freud" or "TAVA is a frog" of maybe "TAVA is a fraulein I've had my eye on for some time now" or . . . you get the idea.

I'm making light of this because the bottom line is that AHM's post means and proves NOTHING. Until TAVA's lawyers file suit (fat chance) all the arm-waving by those wanting revenge on someone for their poor investment choices will result in a light breeze, at best.

Legal definitions are only relevant to determine if the plaintiff has proven that the defendant engaged in a particular conduct, not whether the defendant knew the definition of the particular conduct at the time he/she engaged in such conduct. Nevertheless, the breeze is refreshing, it's over 100 in LA today.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News