SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nokia (NOK)
NOK 6.640-0.4%12:58 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tero kuittinen who wrote (950)9/3/1998 5:17:00 PM
From: Leif V Singman  Read Replies (1) of 34857
 
Thanks for your extensive reply Tero, and thanks also for Clark's and jb's comments. Tero's views pretty much reinforces my own beliefs.

The following just arrived via email. I thought it pertinent to our discussion.

Subj: Clarification of statement in Nikkei Newspaper
Date: 98-09-03 11:20:51 EDT
From: majordom@www.ericsson.nl
Sender: owner-press-releases@mailbase.ericsson.se
Reply-to: pressmailer@mailbase.ericsson.se
To: press-releases@mailbase.ericsson.se

Clarification of statement in Nikkei Newspaper

Clarification regarding a statement by Ericsson CEO Sven-Christer Nilsson that
was incorrectly represented in an interview published in Nikkei Newspaper,
Japan.

In response to a question about whether Ericsson is willing to pay royalties
to the American company Qualcomm, Sven-Christer Nilsson stated that Ericsson
always is prepared to pay compensation for valid intellectual property rights
based on reasonable terms and that, similarly, Ericsson expects respect and
compensation for its IPR's.

Sven-Christer Nilsson is an optimist and therefore hopes that Ericsson can
reach an amicable solution both for the standards and the IPR issue in further
talks.

This clarification should be seen in the light of the fact that, despite
thorough investigation, Ericsson has found no reason to believe that ETSI's
present WCDMA standard would infringe upon any valid IPR's claimed by
Qualcomm.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News