Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (36728)	9/3/1998 11:34:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) of 1571256

Paul, <since AMD is obviously having problems getting the K6-3 design to work> Let me puzzle you a bit: why would you think Intel is not selling Celerons at 400 and 450 Mhz NOW while every Celery was proven to be overclocked well above these limits? Give it a try, Paul! <..L2 CACHE IS DEADLOCKED... Wrong again, Ali !> Really? Your chemical background and IC packaging experience have eventually led you to a correct idea: Message 5642843 "Raw Clock speeds are not silly - they are essential METRICS of a given process/design capability." You also have proven that you able to read: techstocks.com techstocks.com <Re: "Raw clock speeds are metrics of a given design." Thanks>. techstocks.com However it is obvious that your comprehension of the microarchitectural matters remains at the level of a IC packager, now home woodworker. For chewing the matter out, try again: techstocks.com which you left without reply, as usual. What can you say? What a betrayal of your buddy Yousef! Now he will have a hard time to explain how it had happened that AMD, with their "inferior" technology, has managed to built more transistors per silicon area than Intel:) Bye-bye. Go woodworking.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next