SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Patriot Scientific - PTSC
PTSC 0.6020.0%Jan 29 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave Swanson who wrote (5441)9/5/1998 1:16:00 AM
From: bob  Read Replies (1) of 8581
 
ALL,

Some interesting chat from Keith Wootten on USENET:

Keith Wootten author profile
email reply
view thread
post new ú post reply
subscribe

Email: Keith@wootten.demon.co.uk
Date: 1998/09/04
Forums: comp.lang.forth
view for bookmarking ú text only


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In article <6sp2e4$uqp$1@home.acesales.com>, Michael Coughlin
<mikc@home.acesales.com> writes

[discussion of CM and MISC chips snipped]

[..The rest of the world will get the idea eventually.]

> The rest of the world will not get the idea if Forth
>programmers keep hiding their work under a bushel. A computer
>chip is no good unless it gets produced by the millions.
>Current designs may be less than optimum, but they get shipped.
>If you keep thinking of new ways to make a better chip, and
>changing the design, then you will get nowhere. Forth programmers
>are always doing the same with their software and their Forth
>systems. Forth is constantly undergoing change. Combine that
>with computer people's habit of putting off documentation,
>and we get nowhere again.

Some time ago Chuck Moore designed a Forth chip, this was the RTX20**
based on the Novix and was a very useful part. It was taken up by
Harris and had some small commercial success. A while later Chuck Moore
designed a better Forth chip. It was taken up by Patriot Scientific and
is being manufactured and touted as primarily a Java chip. It's very
fast, inexpensive, available, documented etc etc and implements some of
the ideas now being extended in the MISC range while using standard
production techniques.

My point is simply that it has been done, that there have been many
concrete results from a life of almost continuous development. The
PSC1000 is a current design, and it's not far off 'optimum'. I've
little doubt that Chuck's ideas will continue to produce real chips;
it's at least partly our responsibility, and in our interest, to ensure
that they are used.

Look at www.ptsc.com for information on the PSC1000 (ShBoom) processor
and at www.forth.com for very impressive benchmarks using their SwiftX
Forth compiler.

Cheers
--
Keith Wootten
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext