Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI)

GPGI 24.03

-1.9%

Jan 28 3:59 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Jeff Williams who wrote (1291)	12/18/1996 10:05:00 PM
From: John Hanley	of 14226

What is the basis in the INCO report for the SPECULATION "that a band of almost pure platinum might be found at the 1000' level." Either you have the facts or you don't. What good is speculation? Is this an unbiased opinion? If there was any hint of "pure" platinum there, don't you think that it would have been long gone by now? What is meant by "pure" platinum in this context, anyway? I'm not a geologist, but I have a hard time believing that such a statement would occur in a responsible report from a geologist. It just doesn't sound right. However, I welcome the thought of being proved wrong about this -- with factual evidence, of course. I'm not trying to downplay GPGI. I'm just questioning the nature of the speculation in the report and your rational for posting/believing it. In other words, with all the apparent effort Jensen has made to be responsible in his press releases, is it doing us any favor to post what appears to be speculative "hype" in this forum? If there is no strong foundation for this "hype," please don't post it. If there is a strong foundation, please include it in your post.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next