Paunch, to me its ok to reply to a post if I feel that the information
given has a single purpose to damage IPM with lies or half truths.
If I can counter this with facts, then I will, but I will not reply
to the person that posted the garbage, but either to one of my last
posts, or to another threader that I respect asking for their opinion
on certain facts. And this other SI member does not have to hold or
even ever brought ipmcf shares. We all know the names of those that
post on this thread that do not hold ipmcf shares and some have come
to a conclusion that IPM may have been and may still be a scam. This
we can deal with and judge the facts they present as information that
may be useful. For myself I have a list of names that I will not post
to, or do a reply to, and for an example I give Bill Jackson. I have
no problem talking about this person. Sometimes Bill will give out
good useful stuff, sometimes garbage, sometimes be polite, but the
bottom line for me is that he will engage in the crap type talk Richard
identified as having a purpose to lower moral and discourage other
posters from reading and posting on this thread.
There are many posters that have a low regard for IPM, past and
present, and I look forward to their posts here, and enjoy any reply
I can give to them. For example thall, knight and Zeev may come on
strong in the "worry" or "concerned" or "I have/will told you so",
but they do not engage in that back and forth game to foul up this
ipmcf thread.
Those others I will not reply or post to will continue to contact
each other thru the Private posts and plan out the next attach on
this thread. Its all very well planned out by them ahead of time,
not only how they will interact with themselves, but also how to
bait some of us so the other can set the hook.
There are ipmcf shareholders out there that have not pledged their
shares simply because they don't read this thread and gave up on IPM
months ago. If they did look in all they see at a glance is fighting
among posters and junk talk. If the 10% is not gotten, then Bill and
those few others will toast each other as a victory.
posters like Jackson have accomplishedwhat they set out to do,
in that to make this ipmcf thread a place that has garbage and
sewer waste mixed in with the posts trying to understand IPM.
Eventho getting the 10% share pledges would bring another hard
and maby dangeous battle to fight, the process we all just
went thru has showned us as not easy prey. Plus I still think whatever the outcome will be, it will be better than that we
would have gotten by just waiting like sheep for a slaughter.
By the way, I was wrong in thinking Bill as not a sicko.
All the sickos will continue to post the garbage, as they are
probably now communicating via Private posts as to what to do
next on this ipmcf thread. Nothing we can do to stop or prevent
them. But if none of us post or reply to any of them, then maby
we can gather a log of what they say to each other, and with the
simple fact that none hold ipmcf shares, show this to SI as a way
to point out that they post here only in a destructive manner.
And I want to repeat what I have said before. Even if they post
in a polite manner, or ask good questions, or give good info, it
is done only to let them back into the flow of exchanges with the
ones not posting or replying to them. Simple a con, or call it a
sucker punch.
Doug |
