SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : TA-Quotes Plus

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bob Jagow who wrote (6347)9/7/1998 11:28:00 AM
From: Sean W. Smith  Read Replies (1) of 11149
 
Bob,

My experience with IE 4.0 is positive. I tried beta 2 and it was terribly buggy. Waited till after I4 SP1 and installed it on top of NT 4.0 SP3. I accidentally installed the active desktop and it crased much so I turned it off. I now have it 5 boxes at work or home that I use daily and it doesn't seem to cause any extra BSOD or any kind of IP stack exceptions. I do use active desktop on one workstation but. I do use it on Two NT Domain controllers one of which has BSOD once in 18 months. The other has not crashed in a year. The unintall and re-install seems to now work as well (limited experience too, 3 for 3 lately with 4.01) I know you have access to more than one machine so I would it give it a try and see what you think. You might be surprised. I find IE 4.0 a fast browser. Unfortuntely I think IE 4.0 may become a required product in the near future. It already is for all the latest MS stuff. I wonder is mirosoft will try to extend winsock to be MS proprietary? BTW: DUN 1.3 and DUN udpate for 98 and both now support Winsock 2.0 as well as "numerous bug fixes" and other new features. Anyone ever notice that MS release notes generally say "Numerous bug fixes" and then list new product features in detail :)

Sean
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext