AT
First, you posted the kanister posting without comment, citing without comment usually means agree, at least concludent agree.
Besides that, who guarantees you not being identical to banister, whoever that is.
Secondly, I certainly welcome comments spoken for and against a matter, in the very general. It makes outcome unclear and raises stock volatility until the market - the participants express a major opinion also in their actions.
This is to ensure you that personally I do not question the right of free speech in any thread. Despite that fact, I have been scared away by other tout threads but I do not bother.
Third, by no means you made the attempt - to explain your motive to Rajiiv. Except from that is your statement that you run far away from any of the stocks mentioned by threaders (I conclude, that you go short?), so you implicitly use the thread ideas as well. In other words your statement is a replication of mine, citing the omitting of overvalued stock.
Fourth, no one is error free. Even that are guys around who proudly post their 20 trades winning streak, in a game where the odds are almost even distributed (with a small alpha over time), you can expect to run into error or can be otherwise fooled my the market or company.
The question is whether you read through my first post in full. If you have you might know some of my perceptions of stock market, and what basic factors can provide information, not influence share prices.
As always, buy low - sell high, id you do.
Christian |
