SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim Roof who wrote (1576)9/8/1998 9:26:00 AM
From: j_b  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
<<But at what point is that a legal fact? What if a child is a willing participant? Your argument assumes that all pedophiles practice rape>>

My comment in no way implied that the child was unwilling. Even a willing child will suffer emotionally from the contact with the pedophile. Read my post again and you will see that the differentiation is not one of willingness, but whether or not there was a victim. Even a willing participant can be a victim.

One other distinction between sex with an underage participant and sex between consenting adults - our society assumes that minors are incapable of making informed decisions. That's why they can't sign contracts or vote. An adult taking advantage of that inability would be seen as similar to a supervisor taking advantage of a subordinates desire to please the boss or their fear of being fired - there is a victim, even if the sex act seems to be consensual.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext