SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 159.59-3.9%Nov 20 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tero kuittinen who wrote (14698)9/8/1998 10:17:00 AM
From: brian h  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
Tero,

And I thought that the small Japanese competitors of NTT-Docomo chose CDMA only because they knew that GSM would be compatible with W-CDMA and they did not want a system that would be upgraded into Docomo-backed standard. I seem to have read wrong newspapers

You read newspapers wrong, rewrote the history, and twisted the facts again. Those small Japanese operators chose CDMA deployments before NTT Docomo's WCDMA plan. NTT Docomo's WCDMA plan reflected its worry of losing market shares to those "small" Japanese operators. NTT Docomo adopted the plan to counter those "small" operators' choice of CDMA.

PS. Those small Japan operators (one owned by TOYOTA) may have more combined revenue than your beloved NOKA. I wonder which "small" definition you are referring to? I would keep my Sony camcoders, Sony TVs, Sony monitors, Sony phones, Sony stereos, Toyota vans, and Toyota sedans any day than you beloved NOKA's products.

Where was NOKA when QCOM invented IS-95? Where was NOKA when QCOM's had the vision to buy internet email- Eudora program? Where was NOKA when QCOM decided to license its CDMA to now about 60 telecom small companies. Where was NOKA when QCOM had this aggressive Globalstar plan back? Where was NOKA when QCOM's Omnitrac system can not find almost non competitor in its field?

Brian H.

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext