SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bill Wexler's Profits of DOOM

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AHM who wrote (2443)9/8/1998 2:36:00 PM
From: Peter V  Read Replies (1) of 4634
 
Wrong again AHM. In order for a defendant to answer, the defendant must be SERVED. Merely filing a lawsuit with the court does not mean that the defendants will ever be served. It costs less than $100 to file most complaints. Eventually, however, a complaint will be dismissed if the defendants are not served. But even if the defendants are served, there is no requirement that the case go to trial, it can be dismissed by the plaintiff at any time, if the plaintiff gets what it wants from the defendant.

Malicious prosecution suits are difficult to win, and require the final disposition of the first suit before the malicious prosecution suit can begin. If the defendants are individuals, it will be cost prohibitive for them to pursue the MP case, as few attorneys take MP cases on a contingency basis. And in this case, we may be talking about issues of first impression, and thus the suit might be brought in good faith, and an MP action won't prevail. So there is little risk for the plaintiff in this case, even if it follows up and serves the defendants.

The defendants could, however, bring a SLAPP suit action, if the state provides for it.

IMHO, you don't know what you are talking about.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext