Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Doughboy who wrote (4159)	9/8/1998 7:14:00 PM
From: j_b	Read Replies (1) of 13994

<<then put Bush under oath and had him lie. If that is true (which is arguable) then Bush is morally no better than Clinton, he's just luckier>> I'm going to make a major presumption here and speak for the people that have been disagreeing with you over the Bush issue. Your comments regarding practicing moral relativism (as it relates to the Bush discussion) would only be true if you believe that Bush would have lied about an affair while under oath. The people disagreeing with you most likely do NOT think Bush would have done that. He would more likely have responded the way Dan Burton did, with a complete confession, during which we would find out that, while he did something wrong by having an affair, he did what he could to make up for it. If it was found that Bush lied under oath, and the Clinton-bashers supported him blindly anyway, you would have a valid point. However, it wasn't, they haven't, and you don't <g>.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next