>>> The profile of the anti-Microsoft type is consistent.. Usually the one at a party who just can't fit in, and has a problem with winners. <<<
You are a winner? No doubt. But not based on your apparent skill set in amateur psychology, nor your writing. So sorry. (:-|) Perhaps in other areas which we have as yet no reason to suspect. I'm sure that's it. I have never met a person, no matter how lowly, who could not contribute something of value, if one found out enough about them.
Nothing wrong with being below average for the board, of course. I don't want to seem elitist. We need MSFT supporters, and people to do dishes, too.
>>> Every anti-Microsoft person I have met fits that description.
Geez, this is how all the other stereotyping starts out also, doesn't it? "All the _____________ (race, sex, ethnic group, other philosophy) people I have met always ____________________". A possible sign of a weak and prejudiced mind. Early onset Alzheimers, perhaps.
You are sure you're not one of those B- BS in psychology types the PR agencies like to hire to troll these fora? It's hard to tell. Your lack of a personal profile for SI makes you seem a little paranoid, but that could be for a good reason. If you are - just admit it. I'm sure we'll all have more respect for you. At least it would be a rational explanation for your thoughts, which till now have seemed so - Random?
Cheers, Chaz |