Julius, yes it would be nice if all current ipmcf shareholders could
realize a future value in their shares, even if they do not input any
new money into a buy out. But as in that phase "no free lunch", there
is no food currently on the lunch table at IPM, and new money will be
needed to buy the food. But to my way of thinking, the lunch table
that the food will be placed on is required, and this has value, and
to me the table was paided for by ipmcf shareholders. So, combine the
no free lunch thought and this to give current shareholders that input
no new money a piece of the pie, but there will be something like a
dilution needed so that the new money folks will be rewarded for their
extra risking by them receiving the flip side of the dilution.
I do disagree somewhat with you and Richard on non ipmcf shareholders
not being able to add new money into a buy out. This is USA and the
captialism that says anyone can do whatever thay choose just so long
it lawful. If sicko people did wrong, go after them in that regard.
If they are a felon, then they cannot do certain thing us others can,
for example hold a gun permit. But if lawful, no state run controls
by who is in power. To me all money is welcome. But I strongly hope
that those sickos do not invest enought to gain control and become
directors. But even if so, they will do whats best for their money,
which ours is also connected to. I have no part of my life's effort
to be over concerned with sickos. They exist and we will have to make
contact with them. Not to will limit your rights to places that you
should have access to. For simple example, if only one stool open
in the mens room, and I smell Bill Jackson on the left and smell
chatters on the right, then I will not let them control my activity.
I believe the next post has a link to the Taylor post I mentioned.
Doug |
