Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bob Walsh who wrote (7255)	9/8/1998 11:14:00 PM
From: Randall E. Brubaker	Read Replies (2) of 14226

Bob: The way I read it was that GPGI did its own assay for the actual shipments for which they have just been paid. Thus this might be different from the assay of $1010 determined earlier. It's meaningful that Sabin got a little more than GPGI did, however, even if the assay was not $1010. I don't know why they didn't just give the numbers. If they were low numbers, I don't think the result would be worse than the suspicions raised by their obvious decision not to be forthcoming about this. I think they have misjudged here, in trying to control the flow of information. They've been very free in telling us about weekly shipments, ramping up, etc. but now that money is on the table they're not saying. If they didn't intend to release info right away when the first payments were received, why didn't they say so a month or so ago? This doesn't look good to me, but the action of the stock price will tell us the story. I've had the impression the last few days that we may have a committed buyer now as well as a committed seller. I also noted those two large blocks at the bid price today, but the stock didn't go down. Randall

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next