Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: wlcnyc who wrote (13607)	9/9/1998 9:36:00 AM
From: aleta	Read Replies (1) of 18444

Bill unlike PT I don't expect everyone to agree with everything I say 100%. It's simply not necessary. I feel you gave a reasoned and well thought out response to why you disagree with me and deserve the best answers I can give. I can't believe what PT says simply because I don't believe PT is who he portrays himself to be. I think he is paid to be here. As to which side is paying him, that's up in the air. If it's the pro side I think they've wasted their money. He's doing a much better job for the negative side. This is my personal opinion. As to my thoughts on why Jon is here. He's here because he would like to figure out this mystery. Is this a real company or not? While he's here he asks questions that may lead to an answer. Granted they are at a negative slant most of the time, because Jon personally believes that penny stocks are scam machines. He's right that most of them are. I also agree with your thought on him enjoying playing devil's advocate against PT. I do believe he rather enjoys arguing with PT because it's too easy. Notice the less PT posts the less Jon posts. The question those of us who have decided to risk our hard earned dollars should be asking ourselves is, "Is this a scam?" We should be doing our level best to find out the answer to that question. Unfortunately when any of us pro or con ask anything remotely on the negative side PT comes on with personal attacks and a lot of ridiculous speculation that I believe is harmful. As to who would answer Jon? I've answered Jon on several occasions when I feel he has over stepped the line. I do my best not to attack him personally, but to simply address his questions or remarks. Sticking to the known facts is always the best defense and looks much better to potential investors IMO. I also agree with you about playing this stock until the chance for a profit disappears. My great concern at this point is that the company doesn't seem to care whether that chance disappears for small investors or not. Meetings with minority investors at this time is not going to impress the investment community IMO. That's who we need to reach in order for this to be profitable to us as investors. BTW has anyone else noticed that PT ranted and raved about those of us who had initially planned on going getting there NOW! Everyday it was a new insistence that we get on the plane a go NOW! Like we didn't have a life to arrange other then for this stock. That's the main reason I began to question should I go and eventually realized it wasn't a good idea just yet. Not until more information is out. Now apparently it will be two weeks before PT goes. I could have gone this week if I had followed through without having to read his constant harassment about going NOW! Again an example of his high handed and arrogant manner being harmful to this stock.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next