Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Sam Citron who wrote (4325)	9/9/1998 8:49:00 PM
From: j g cordes	Read Replies (2) of 13994

Anyone.. a serious question. What did the grand jury actually do besides sit and listen to a one sided presentation? Did they vote at the end on what evidence was good or bad, did they question or ask for balancing opinion, were they able during testimony to ask questions of witnesses or challenge their credibility? Were all those jurists just a prop so that the proceedings had the look of a balanced presentation? If Starr had witnesses present to a silent group of people without their offering rebutal or counter agrument, and if the grand jury didn't have any powers to question or to administer opinion.. that's not anything I remember about Constitutional Government or the process for arriving at truth.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next