SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 163.32+2.3%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dave who wrote (14773)9/10/1998 1:47:00 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (3) of 152472
 
Dave, Did they say they'd pay 7.314159% of gross sales for 20 years? Plus $1bn initial payment? Plus backward compatibility with cdmaOne. Plus the Qualcomm chip rate. All I saw them say was they'd give a nominal finder's fee for a couple of patents they say they don't really need or words to that effect. I'd also set a pre-requisite that the European countries agree that cdmaOne and cdma2000 can be freely sold in Europe.

Philips/Lucent has already agreed to a cdma2000 licence. Quite a big island! It is in the early days that licensing is needed. Those days were the late 1980s and early 1990s. Those days have gone. Once a company is big enough, licensing other companies is more of a distraction and brand contamination than an advantage. It might be that L M Ericsson is undesirable as a licencee.

It is a bit like people rushing to buy stock in a company AFTER the problems are all solved, sales are booming and profits are huge. If you check a few graphs, you'll see that the cheap prices are in the early days when risks are high, competition dominant and there is little light at the end of the tunnel.

The same for using Qualcomm's property. The cheap days have gone. Now I want very big payments for the years of no dividends, high risks and creativity by Qualcomm.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext