SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc.
DELL 126.42+2.8%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: The Phoenix who wrote (64722)9/10/1998 2:12:00 PM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (1) of 176387
 
Gary, think about what you are saying. If you had a CD that yields 5% for one year, then your method would say that the instrument actually yielded 4.76% at the end of the year. What you really mean to be saying is that your worth was 4.76% less last year than it is now. The problem with your point is that if you expect 5% growth in the next period it makes no sense at the end of the period to then say that you actually experienced 4.76% growth in the previous period. If actual growth exactly equaled expected growth the two numbers should be identical.

This is a matter of convention and definition. If you did $1 billion this period and $800 million last period, then your growth rate (by convention!!!) is 25%. It is fair to say that your sales were 20% lower in the previous period, but growth rates are by convention forward looking. I challenge you to show me one company or instance in which growth is calculated as you propose.

What's interesting here is that this discussion precisely underscores the problems with trailing P/Es. They use the wrong denominator. That's why I prefer to use forward-looking P/Es. Of course, this is a problem in comparing a stock (price) to uncertain flows (earnings).

TTFN,
CTC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext