Ampex Corporation (AEXCA) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)

AMPX 11.34

+4.1%

11:54 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: killybegs who wrote (3384)	9/10/1998 4:19:00 PM
From: flickerful	Read Replies (1) of 17679

That's when the Judge said.."What does that prove...that you intermittently infringe. Do we have to disagree with Judge McKelvie's claim construction? McKelvie said frequency changes and gating did not change the signal. Mitsu then went on to element 4 concerning some ruling McKelvie made on that and there was a number of sharp questions as to why Mitsu was bringing that before the Court.. there is your case. they could not say no, a finding inconsistent with McKelvie is not required. period.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next