SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dayuhan who wrote (24865)9/10/1998 10:03:00 PM
From: Dayuhan  Read Replies (2) of 108807
 
From International Herald Tribune coverage of the Starr report:

"A central focus of the report, according to The Washington Post, is whether Mr. Clinton sought to retrieve gifts he had given Ms. Lewinsky, perhaps by sending Mrs. Currie to her apartment, that were subpoenaed by Paula Jones's lawyers.

Another central point is whether Mr. Clinton tried to arrange a job for Ms. Lewinsky to induce her to deny, in an affidavit for Mrs. Jones's lawyers, that she had had a sexual relationship with the president. Mrs. Currie might have had knowledge of such an attempt."

If those "central points" are the best they can come up with, after months of investigation, impeachment would be ridiculous, and would make us the laughingstock of the world. Giving gifts and asking for them back? Arranging a job? Indiscreet, yes, but hardly threatening the fabric of the republic.

If they can't do better than that on the fundraising report, the Republicans are going to face a serious backlash, I'd guess. How many months, how many millions, and all we get is low-grade soap opera? Come ON!

Steve
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext