SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ampex Corporation (AEXCA)
AMPX 13.15+5.7%3:59 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hal Campbell who wrote (3360)9/11/1998 9:30:00 AM
From: flickerful  Read Replies (1) of 17679
 
They checked neither yes or no on literal infringement on 3, but checked yes on infringement under the doctrine of equivalents,

the thing is the non-checking of 3 was a response more to the jury intsruction, rather than any undermining of their clear construction
that literally, Mitsubishi used one clock.

rather, they left it unchecked because it was not unanimous
under the jury instruction standard. it is not therefore dispositive of their finding under 2, as McKelvie
inexplicably would have one believe, by his ruling...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News