> Cheryl, Actually, the ignore method has been tried, both passively and actively....
> ... although I have actively or passively ignored the group, they have flooded the Yahoo LGND board ...
Henry, the difference between "actively" or "passively" ignoring is beyond by own scientific powers to observe, but I HAVE OBSERVED you flood THIS thread with links to THEIR links, quite effectively giving them the attention they are asking for, and giving them plenty of advertising.
And I wish I had a dollar for each time you REPEATED the same DETAILS of the Courtney, Dale, naysayer stories. We don't need the repetition (we heard you the first few times), and the repetition plays into the hand of those who are teasing you.
I looked over at Yahoo last night (what stupid nonsense garbage! Why would you want to post there?), at what were then the last few LGND posts. (I have no intention of going back there today.)
Here's what they EXPECT and WANT you to do.
It's right in the kicker at the END of Yahoo Post 3123:
(Will you be predictable? Will you give it to them?)
"So if I were you all, take a long vacation because Dr. Niman is about to present you hundreds of posts with multiple hyperlinks showing everyone he was right all along.
Be prepared fellow campers, what your about to see is the greatest show of dearth."
----------------
Henry, it's entirely up to you, whether or not you play into that and give them all they want.
You can go over there, make denials, re-explain your side of the story to them, threaten them with exposure and raised eyebrows --- but you'll only pour fuel into their fire. And the clowns will LOVE it, and re-double their efforts to tease you. I will sympathize with you, as I watch you dig yourself in deeper.
The clowns don't give a hoot about either you or Ligand --- they are just playing a game.
Good luck,
Cheryl |
