SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc.
DELL 126.42+2.8%Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: puborectalis who wrote (65236)9/12/1998 11:58:00 AM
From: Chuzzlewit  Read Replies (2) of 176387
 
Stephen, I am very critical of Starr and his motives in this tawdry affair, but I am not going to let Clinton off the hook that easily. In his affair with Lewinsky he behaved in a way that was arrogant, and he seemed to be defying people, perhaps his wife, to discover his indiscretions. It was almost like teenage bravado. It was adolescent behavior.

Nevertheless, the damage that Starr is doing the office of the presidency by exposing this tabloid-like lurid tale is almost irreparable. His posturing around "obstruction of justice" and other similarly high sounding phrases wears thin. The real question the prosecutor was asked to investigate was whether Clinton was guilty of high crimes and misdemeanors -- assaults on constitutional governance of this country -- not whether he engaged in bouts of heavy adolescent breathing in the oval office.

Will we now have an independent counsel who will set up shop permanently to discover all of the personal indiscretions of the president? How about video cameras constantly following him around? Maybe we should bug the First bedroom to make sure that only approved sex takes place?

What kind of lunatic would want to be president in such an environment?

TTFN,
CTC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext