SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Roger's 1998 Short Picks

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: majormember who wrote (13685)9/12/1998 2:25:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (2) of 18691
 
Skane, he lied under oath. He lied straight to the American people's face when he thought it was a matter of he said, she said. If Clinton were the CEO of a publicly traded company I would be ready to short it. Perhaps I will think of him as such, and short SPY.

"yet you want him totally and absolutely destroyed."

When did I say that? Why do you assume that? It's just like a liberal apologist to accuse anyone who has the nerve to question their minimization of this serious situation of having evil intentions.

If you think you can trust someone who has lied over and over that's fine. I do not. But it is disingenuous to suggest that one need to be perfect in order to see through Clinton's lies.

"Since you never liked him to begin with, it may be hard to find ANY redeeming qualities about him, but look at the facts."

That's a good strategy, just assume facts not in evidence. You didn't go to the White House school of spin doctoring, did you? Why do you assume that because I noticed that he bald faced lied to the public that I never liked him to begin with?

"Where are the indictments over WhiteWater or lies over any other
matter besides sex??.....there are NONE.
"

Twaddle. There have been 43 convictions resulting from Starr's
investigation.

"Starr has spent years and Millions investigating Clinton and could not find ANY lies, or misbehavior on anything besides him diddling some girl.""

More accurately you mean that he couldn't prove it because Clinton covered his tracks well.

I do like the way the Clinton apologists are wont to point out how much money has been spent in the investigation, but never point out how much the stonewalling by the President contributed to those costs.

Barb
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext