SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : THE STARR REPORT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Intrepid1 who wrote (112)9/12/1998 3:54:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (2) of 1533
 
"And don't you find it a tad suspicious that all the "revelations" in today's report were already widely known? This proves Starr and his team of inquisitors were illegally leaking Grand Jury testimony."

Don't you find it interesting that the White House spin machine was able to publish a rebuttal before the report was issued citing these so called illegal leaks? Do you think that you would trust the leaks of someone who is supposedly politically motivated to get you to publish such a 'rebuttal'? Or do you think it more logical that the spin machine actually has someone inside, and that the leaks are actually the responsibility of the White House?

Barb
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext