>But if we adopt your standards we will have to remove between
60 to 80 % of your elected officials from office.<
I suspect this is quite false. You see, the difference between the President and the 60%-80% of elected officials you imply are involved in inapropriate sexual relationships and who remain in office and who have not filtered through our legal process (now where is your proof all this is true?), is that these people have not been accused of sexual harrasment in a court of law. Moreover, since they have not been accused of sexual harrasment in a court of law, they have not yet committed perjury in such a court. Since they have not yet been thusly accused, and since they have not yet committed perjury, then I would wager Mr. Zoltan would have no problem with these 60%-80% of yours remaining in office.
>Congress and the presidency have been noted for sex scandals and rumors since the beginning of the republic.<
This is really beside the point, now isn't it? The issue is whether any one of these have, since the beginning of the republic, been allowed to lie as a means of defending themselves from justice, this, certifiably, incontrovertibly and in a court of law. This is the issue, and you must stick to it to debate it logically. |
