SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)
QCOM 163.32+2.3%Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dougjn who wrote (14925)9/12/1998 11:37:00 PM
From: gdichaz  Read Replies (1) of 152472
 
To Doug: Rant read. Fine recital of history and some good reminders re what the founding fathers may or may not have meant. Problem is, no one is now alive to know what the founding fathers really meant and the Congress is now to decide what that may be with the finding by the House and the trial in the Senate with the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court presiding. That decision is final. Period. I am reminded of the poem - a rose is a rose is a rose, viz perjury is perjury is perjury. Fine lines and fine distinctions may be fun for lawyers but are completely irrelevant to the Congressional impeachment proceedings. Maybe that is a bad idea, and maybe some of us wish that we not so, but it is. The President will be impeached if the House does that, and if the Senate finds him guilty - that is all she wrote. But probably Clinton will fight on after that too - if it should come to that. :-) Perhaps he would appeal to the Supreme Court - he will if past is prologue. After all that would keep a roof over his head for a little time longer. :-) Chaz
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext