SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Zeev Hed who wrote (5079)9/13/1998 12:01:00 AM
From: Carl R.  Read Replies (3) of 13994
 
Zeev I think that from a strictly legal standpoint the case for perjury is pretty clear cut. As for the obstruction of justice charge as it relates to getting others to lie on his behalf I think it is bogus. To me there is a big difference between lying to associates and and trying to persuede associates to lie.

I am still baffled as to why the man chose to lie under oath, and then made his famous finger wagging speech to the public. Surely his wife knew the truth by then, and he had nothing to lose by telling the truth. I can only attribute it to an arrogant belief that the public will believe anything that he says and a feeling that he is above the law.

In the end I think that his lie to the American public will hurt him more than the perjury. That memorable sound bite is in everyone's minds, and explains his loss of support in the polls. We all remember the line "I am not a crook". I expect that the line "I did not have sexual relations with that woman" will be equally memorable to the next generation.

The other thing that will hurt him is his failure to apologize when he was finally was forced to admit the affair. The public is not buying his line that his answer was "legally accurate", so hiding behind legal technicalities will only hurt him. His latest tack of begging for forgiveness is much more likely to succeed.

In my opinion there will be much debate in the house as to whether or not to impeach the man, but in the end most politicians are spineless. In my view if the polls run in Clinton's favor, the house will back off. If the run strongly against him, they will impeach. If the polls are intermediate, then the politicians will have to search down deep and do what they think is right. Thus even though I think the legal case for perjury is clear cut, I think the case will be won or lost in the battle for the public.

Carl
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext