Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)

AMZN 226.19

-1.8%

Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Bill Harmond who wrote (17046)	9/13/1998 8:36:00 AM
From: Glenn D. Rudolph	Read Replies (1) of 164684

I got fed up with the agenda here. There is no discussion here, just piling-on. It's boring. When Glenn (who has no experience with the principals) came back with that "Let's get an unbiased source," my first impulse was to tell him to f*ck off. It's a waste for me to spend any time here. William, I honestly did not intend to upset you. My comment was only to indicate the MS and Mary Meeker do have a vested interest in AMZN. I know you feel strongly about the positive future of AMZN. It is my opinion the AMZN has no future. Differing views is what makes a market. I do not establish my belief that Amazon has no future by what the analysts or opther medis states. My believe is based solely on the business model as I see it, management's lack of ability to understand retail and looking at the balance and income statements. It's all you can tolerate, but you should be practicing more care. It's real money for me. I can tell you that this is real money for me too and I have a lost a large amount. It is not play money or money I clearly do not need. This thread my frustrate you but my losses frustrate me. I took my short position based on the fundamentals and have been incorrect to this point. I may be foolish but I plan on seeing this through. Candidly, I respect and admire your opinions. I do dissagree with your long term view on AMZN as stated. I cannot say I respect the opinion of Morgan Stanley. Given a choice of a differing opinion bewteen you and Morgan Stanley, I would choose you as being correct any time. Finally, I am not a conspiracy theory pundit. I have have been. Look back at my posts and except for short term bounces, I am consistantly talking about fundamentals. I do apologize for offending you. I mean it even more than Bill Clinton. That last sentence was just to lighten up. Glenn

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next