My response to your post Aleta is the same as it was on Yahoo/ESVS:
It truly amazes me how sometimes you can make such
perfect common sense, and then all of a sudden stray into
territory that makes me think you're a resident in the Deep
Space Nine space station where so many kinds of
humanocreatures co-exist.
First off, I'm highly appreciative of your supporting remarks
concerning Mkingsle's intimidation. My reponse is simple
and rooted in a statement I've made in the past: I'm not
going to take his bum trip!
His actions are his own actions; and mine are mine. I'm
comfortable with where I'm at; it's up to him to be
comfortable with where he's at. Whatever his motivation--I
can't account for it--he went too far. But he's gone off the
beaten path before only to come back OK. I hope once
again he comes back OK. No, I'm not reporting him. He
can be his own judge.
But relative to his statement that Hayton was in Palm
Springs? Well, that simply cannot be a true remark.
The only way in which I can account for such a
contradictory remark, if what he says is true, is someone in
the Zulu office thought Hayton returned to his home in Palm
Springs, unaware of the fact that Hayton returned to his
home in Newport. When you've got the money to travel and
you have several homes, leaving the office saying, "I'm going
home," can leave one with less than certain information.
I'm confident my reporting to you about our Friday morning
meeting will be verified. I've no doubt about this.
Now, Aleta, here's how you get to Deep Space Nine. A
Hayton imposter?!? That's really funny and a well-rooted
paranoic position. I provided a vivid description of what
Hayton looks like. He also handed me a "Draft 1" copy of
the press release that went out that very morning, and asked
if I had yet seen it on the wires.
So, nope. Nice try. Hell of a reach. But this man I met was
no Hayton imposter. No imposter would have the
knowledge of the company that this man had. I find even
your raising this possibility as comical, at best, particularly
given your own experience.
Regarding my feelings toward you and your contact with
Hayton? Wrong! Terribly wrong! You're conveniently
forgetting the clear fact that I was one of your defenders
(see my past ESVS/Yahoo posts near that time period)
when everyone jumped on you, when you reported that you
and Hayton had a conversation. I never doubted you.
And, even funnier is your implication that I was jealous that
he contacted you, and not myself? There you go again,
you're out there in that Deep Space Nine world. The fact is
I encourage positive relationships among each participant on
this thread, including you, whether you recognize it or not.
Why not, here now, simply admit you don't see me in a
positive light and that this dates back to when I--perhaps
too harshly-- ruffled your feathers when you were posting
negatively and parroting Wired and other negative posters?
In any event, once again, I thank you for your kind remarks
regarding the Mkingle incident.
I'm perfectly willing to accept you for who you are; but you
are not at all willing to accept me for who I am. And that's a
that.
In conclusion, I'm absolutely appalled no one, including you,
has taken the time to contact the Boston hotel
(617/262-9600) to verify Hayton's presence, where room
and telephone records (he also did a lot of faxing) would
verify his presence.
|
